Delivering energy efficient buildings: A design procedure to demonstrate environmental and economic benefits

Horsley, A; France, C and Quatermass, B (2003) Delivering energy efficient buildings: A design procedure to demonstrate environmental and economic benefits. Construction Management and Economics, 21(4), pp. 345-356. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

One of the most significant environmental impacts of buildings occurs through the consumption of energy during their operational lives. It is a well-known fact that buildings in the UK are only a fraction as efficient as current approaches and available technologies permit. The effective management of the design process is pivotal in the delivery of buildings with improved energy efficiency but, despite this, the monitoring of energy performance is not currently a typical part of the construction design process. This paper describes the development of a design management procedure in which energy performance is monitored from the earliest phases of building inception. The decision support tool gives guidance to design teams at a stage in the design process where there is currently a lack of information on project-specific energy performance issues, and their environmental and economic implications. Life cycle cost performance is captured through elemental life cycle costing, in which the implementation of systems to improve efficiency are considered as a function of additional and avoided life cycle costs. This procedure has been developed through public-sector private finance initiative (PFI) projects, which allow a longer-term view of both capital and operating costs, since the contractors are an integral part of the long-term management consortium. The much greater level of opportunity presented in these contracts and the potential to influence the wider marketplace could offer a breakthrough for the wider acceptance of environmentally sensitive building design.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building design; energy efficiency; life cycle costing; private finance initiative; sustainable construction
Index terms: life cycle, energy efficiency, building design, consortium, efficiency, energy-efficient building, costing, energy performance, implementation, monitoring, operating cost, design team, life cycle cost, decision support, sustainable construction, design process, consumption, private finance initiative, design management, environmental impact
Subjects: decision analysis, partnership management, accounting and finance, performance management, research methods, sustainable construction, design process, sustainable design, sustainability and energy, economic analysis, architectural design, energy systems, contractual arrangements, professional practice, design methods, value management, control systems, consumer economics, environmental impact
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Sustainability, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Design Practice, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here