Nicholas, J and Edwards, D J (2003) A model to evaluate materials suppliers' and contractors' business interactions. Construction Management and Economics, 21(3), pp. 237-245. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
A symbiotic business relationship exists between materials suppliers and construction contractors. Specifically, contractors must continually purchase materials on credit to complete projects, whilst suppliers exist on the profits made from selling such. In the absence of this indirect source of liquidity, many construction projects would not be completed. Despite the supplier incurring substantial financial risk when furnishing credit to contractors, there are currently no definitive or accurate means with which to measure and predict this risk. This paper presents the findings of a survey conducted throughout the UK that aimed to model the utility value that material suppliers experience when they interact with contractors. It is proposed that the (novel and new) methodological approach used will enable materials suppliers to enhance their decision-making process and subsequently boost business performance (and most notably, profit). Such improvements could ultimately be passed directly to good debtors in terms of lower materials costs, better delivery specifications, and improved creditor staff motivation. Subsequently, this could translate as more economical construction projects for clients. The paper concludes with direction for future works that would develop a more user-friendly software package and subsequently implement the research findings throughout the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business relationships; construction contractors; credit and debt; creditworthiness; financial management; materials suppliers; utility |
| Index terms: | construction contractor, business performance, construction project, motivation, software package, profit, survey, specification, interaction, construction industry, decision-making process, business relationship, financial management, liquidity |
| Subjects: | strategic management, data collection methods, practitioner, psychology, economic analysis, software systems, performance measurement, contractual condition, production management, decision analysis, behavioral psychology, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Contract Administration, Quality Management, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here