Pietroforte, R and Gregori, T (2003) An input-output analysis of the construction sector in highly developed economies. Construction Management and Economics, 21(3), pp. 319-327. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Using OECD input/output tables at current and constant prices, this paper analyses the performance of the construction sector of eight highly industrialized countries - Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, The Netherlands, Japan and the USA - in the 1970s and 1980s. First, the main characteristics of the data set with country and time coverage are briefly introduced. Then, a set of simple indicators is used for comparative purposes, namely to assess the construction sector's diminishing role in terms of share in gross output, value added and GNP. Analysis focuses also on technologies, with emphasis on the relative role of manufacturing and services inputs. Lastly, standard measures of linkages are used to determine the main sources of induced output that are created by the push and pull effects of the construction sector on the rest of the economy.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | constant prices; construction technologies; input/ouput analysis; linkages |
| Index terms: | Germany, construction sector, Denmark, France, Netherlands, Japan, input-output analysis, construction technology, linkage, Canada, Australia |
| Subjects: | business, digital engineering, data analysis and analytics, Geography, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here