Innovation in clean-room construction: A case study of co-operation between firms

Shields, R and West, K (2003) Innovation in clean-room construction: A case study of co-operation between firms. Construction Management and Economics, 21(4), pp. 337-344. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

This study examines partnering between a large client, multinational contractors and specialist suppliers, and local subcontractors involved in a project to construct clean room facilities. An ethnographic approach is used, which demonstrates the changing attitudes, values and the new working arrangements that emerged. The social bond of a 'construction challenge' was the basis of trust and sharing risk in a 'quasi-fixed network'. In place of formal contracts, ongoing bargaining and continuous negotiation took place. However, the client was seen to dominate the construction process. Shared workspaces or 'liminal zones', betwixt and between firms, were created to allow collaboration. These are argued to be a practical organizational approach to sharing information and co-ordinating inter-firm activities. Among trades, agreements were struck to exchange training and apprenticeships for allowing foreign specialists and equipment to be imported by the high-purity gas supplier. Liminal zones appear to function as on-the-job classrooms for rapidly training workers in unfamiliar construction techniques and systems.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Canada; clean rooms; inter-organizational innovation; labour relations; partnering; quasi-fixed network; risk
Index terms: classroom, negotiation, labour relation, specialist supplier, subcontractor, workspace, construction process, case study, organizational innovation, agreements, multinational contractor, Canada, apprenticeship, bargaining, collaboration, partnering
Subjects: construction type, management, strategic management, economics, practitioner, business, Geography, partnership management, data collection methods, building construction, conflict resolution, professional education, contract formation
Topics: Roles and Professions, Supply Chain Management, Organizational Design, Site Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Contract Administration, International Construction, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Education
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here