Shohet, I M; Lavy-Leibovich, S and Bar-On, D (2003) Integrated maintenance monitoring of hospital buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 21(2), pp. 219-228. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The performance of hospital buildings depends to a large degree on the efficiency of maintenance execution. The research objectives were to examine the efficiency of maintenance under alternative maintenance policies and alternative sources of labour (outsourcing vs. in-house). The research focused on main-tenance of hospital buildings as a model for multi-system buildings operating in dynamic environments. The research used a systematic field survey followed by an in-depth statistical analysis. Four key performance indicators (KPIs) were developed. The first, the building performance indicator (BPI), indicates the physical-functional condition of buildings. The second, the manpower sources diagram (MSD), reflects the efficiency of using in-house labour vs. the outsourcing of labour. The third, the maintenance efficiency indicator (MEI), is based on the annual costs of maintenance, the building age coefficient and the building occupancy coefficient. This indicator reflects the efficiency of usage of the resources (labour, outsourcing, materials and spare parts) in maintenance. The fourth indicator deals with the organizational structure of the maintenance division. The proposed KPIs integrate four aspects of hospital facilities management: performance management, composition of labour, efficiency of main-tenance operations and organizational effectiveness. Efficient execution of maintenance management of hospital buildings may be obtained by the simultaneous implementation of the aforementioned KPIs. The proposed indicators may be adapted to other types of facilities, such as office buildings, industrial plants and infrastructure.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | facilities management; key performance indicators; life cycle costs; maintenance management; outsourcing; performance |
| Index terms: | statistical analysis, building age, organizational effectiveness, office building, key performance indicator, outsourcing, performance management, efficiency, maintenance management, system building, implementation, hospital facility, monitoring, survey, life cycle cost, building performance, organizational structure, facilities management |
| Subjects: | management, performance measurement, research methods, maintenance engineering, performance management, quality assurance, building construction, sociology, asset management, control systems, data collection methods, construction type, business, data science, contractual arrangements, project delivery |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Procurement, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Site Management, Organizational Design, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here