Thomas, A V; Kalidindi, S N and Ananthanarayanan, K (2003) Risk perception analysis of BOT road project participants in India. Construction Management and Economics, 21(4), pp. 393-407. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Despite massive investment opportunities and the establishment of a framework for private sector participation in highway infrastructure development programmes in India, private investment (including foreign direct investment) in this sector is not up to the expected level. A high degree of risk exposure, disagreement on many risk issues among major stakeholders, and the absence of adequate government guarantees have been identified as some of the major reasons for this lukewarm response. This paper discusses the outcome of a risk perception analysis carried out to evaluate the risk criticality, risk management capability, risk allocation/sharing preference, and factors influencing risk acceptance of major stakeholders. A survey was conducted among senior project participants such as government officials, promoters, lenders and consultants of Indian BOT road projects. Eight types of risks have been identified as very critical in the Indian road sector under BOT set up with traffic revenue risk being the most critical. Though there is fair agreement among survey respondents with respect to the risk management capabilities of stakeholders, their preferences of allocations are divergent. The significant factors influencing the risk acceptance of each stakeholder are identified through regression analysis. The study reveals that the factors and their relative influence on the risk acceptance of stakeholders are considerably different.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bot projects; highway infrastructure; India; regression; risk acceptance; risk allocation; risk critically; risk perception; traffic revenue risk |
| Index terms: | risk perception, private sector participation, programme, revenue, survey, guarantee, exposure, preference, promoter, foreign direct investment, India, highway infrastructure, regression analysis, private investment, road project, risk management, risk allocation |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, environmental hazards, sociology, project controls, financial risk, infrastructure engineering, Geography, civil engineering, public and environmental health, decision-making and reasoning, contract structure, economic analysis, stakeholder participation, risk assessment, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Time Control, International Construction, Procurement, Sustainability, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here