A neural network bid/no bid model: The case for contractors in Syria

Wanous, M; Boussabaine, H A and Lewis, J (2003) A neural network bid/no bid model: The case for contractors in Syria. Construction Management and Economics, 21(7), pp. 737-744. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Despite the crucial importance of the 'bid/no bid' decision in the construction industry, it has been given little attention by researchers. This paper describes the development and testing of a novel bid/no bid model using the artificial neural network (ANN) technique. A back-propagation network consisting of an input buffer with 18 input nodes, two hidden layers and one output node was developed. This model is based on the findings of a formal questionnaire through which key factors that affect the 'bid/no bid' decision were identified and ranked according to their importance to contractors operating in Syria. Data on 157 real-life bidding situations in Syria were used in training. The model was tested on another 20 new projects. The model wrongly predicted the actual bid/no bid decision only in two projects (10%) of the test sample. This demonstrates a high accuracy of the proposed model and the viability of neural network as a powerful tool for modelling the bid/no bid decision-making process. The model offers a simple and easy-to-use tool to help contractors consider the most influential bidding variables and to improve the consistency of the bid/no bid decision-making process. Although the model is based on data from the Syrian construction industry, the methodology would suggest a much broader geographical applicability of the ANN technique on bid/no bid decisions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 'bid/no bid' criteria; ANN; ANN bidding model; construction; Syria
Index terms: methodology, questionnaire, bidding, bid/no-bid, neural network, accuracy, Syria, artificial neural network, propagation, buffer, modelling, testing, construction industry, decision-making process
Subjects: professional development, financial risk, research methods, industry analysis, decision analysis, engineering process, data collection methods, analytical methods, professional practice, bidding, artificial intelligence, political and administrative geography, modelling and simulation
Topics: Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Cost Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here