Haidar, A; Underwood, J and Coates, P (2019) Smart processes for smart buildings: 'Sustainable processes', 'recyclable processes' and 'building seeds' in parametric design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 15(5), pp. 402-429. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The rapid evolution of digital technologies and the resulting emergence of novel design methodologies are coinciding with climate change, population growth and increasing pressure on global resources. This concurrence evokes opportunities to harness new design methods to develop smart design solutions and processes that respond effectively to sustainability requirements. Meanwhile, parametric design is emerging as an ideal design methodology to support sustainably in design. This research explores the multifaceted way in which parametric design supports sustainability, and how this can lead to a more holistic understanding of sustainability by shifting the focus from sustainable buildings to sustainable processes. In addition, the work shows how the reusability of parametric definitions in parametric design applications enables designers to recycle the design process, where a parametric definition acts as a building seed that can be 'planted' in different projects to automatically generate different forms. This may enable designers around the world to collectively develop a 'seed library' in order to empower, automate and enhance the environmental values of their processes. To achieve this, the main changes and shifts in computational design are reviewed, together with the impact of parametric design and its related applications on the architectural design process. In addition, a case study is conducted to explore how parametric design can significantly accelerate processes in practice, and how the overlooked potential of reusing parametric definitions can make distinctive results in real architectural projects. Finally, the efficiency of 'seed library' is discussed as opposed to the apparent issues such as validity of seeds, sharing motivation, and copyright.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architectural design process; building seeds; parametric design; recyclable processes; seed library; sustainable processes |
| Index terms: | validity, designer, parametric design, motivation, design process, case study, sustainable process, efficiency, recycle, architectural design, emergence, climate change, digital technology, design method, sustainable building, evolution, methodology, smart building, population |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, profession, construction type, waste management, climate science, computing systems, design methods, psychology, environmental science, design practice, research methods, performance management, health safety and environment, sustainable construction, demography, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Human Resources, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here