Zhi, M; Hua, G B; Wang, S Q and Ofori, G (2003) Total factor productivity growth accounting in the construction industry of Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 21(7), pp. 707-718. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Total factor productivity (TFP) determines long-term economic growth and is a comprehensive industry-level productivity measure. This paper proposes Jorgenson's method as an appropriate TFP measurement for the construction industry. The method is less restrictive than the conventional Chau's approach, as it does not impose the Hick Neutral Technical Change assumption. Jorgenson's method is then applied to estimate TFP growth in the construction industry of Singapore over 1984-1998. TFP growth is found down by 1.53% per annum over this period, indicating that the performance of TFP in the construction industry lags behind the rest of economy. TFP growth is also found to be fluctuating over time and tends to move in tandem with the construction business cycle. As a monitor of progress towards TFP achievement, factors influencing TFP growth in the construction industry of Singapore over 1984-1997 are identified. Seven factors are found to be significantly related to TFP growth. Among them, economies of scale, R&D by the industry, investment allowance granted and labour unions are leading contributors to TFP growth; while foreign worker, construction accidents and pre-cast are major hampers. The general methodology presented in this study can be applied to other countries. Future studies are required to find appropriate indicators for factors unquantified.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | growth accounting; indicators; Singapore; total factor productivity; translog production function |
| Index terms: | productivity, Singapore, estimate, labour union, construction industry, economic growth, future study, foreign worker, total factor productivity, accounting, methodology, construction accident |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, occupational health and safety management, Geography, economic development, management, research methods, economics, financial and cost management, economic analysis, production economics, business, research design and methodology |
| Topics: | International Construction, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here