Blismas, N; Sher, W; Thorpe, A and Baldwin, A (2004) A typology for clients' multi-project environments. Construction Management and Economics, 22(4), pp. 357-371. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Construction management research and practice is dominated by a single project paradigm. This does not reflect the nature of many construction clients who have large multi-project portfolios. Traditional single project management strategies are usually adopted for managing such portfolios - with limited success. The literature suggests that programmes, within portfolios, require different forms of management in order to optimize project delivery. In order to better understand these portfolios and thereby allow the exploration of new forms of management, a typology has been developed mapping out the various features of client's construction portfolios. The resultant typology provides a simple method for identifying the programme composition of a portfolio, highlighting the expected features of each programme type, and thereby directing management attention to the main aspects of each programme that can be optimized for efficiency. Six cases of client's construction project portfolios were studied using a highly structured, replication logic, case study methodology. A typology of clients' multi-project environments was developed and validated through literal and theoretical replication between cases. Three main types emerged as descriptive of programmes within client's construction portfolios: bounded programmes, target programmes and rolling programmes. The distinctive features of each type suggest that programme-specific approaches may be necessary for the successful delivery of projects within client's construction portfolios.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case studies; multi-projects; portfolio; programmes; typology |
| Index terms: | project management, project delivery, paradigm, construction client, case study, efficiency, construction project, mapping, exploration, methodology, programme, strategy, management research |
| Subjects: | project delivery, environmental resource management, practitioner, data collection methods, research design and methodology, project controls, production management, project management theory and practice, management, education and knowledge transfer, spatial and geospatial analysis, research methods, performance management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Time Control, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here