Chandra, V and Loosemore, M (2004) Women's self-perception: An inter-sector comparison of construction, legal and nursing professionals. Construction Management and Economics, 22(9), pp. 947-956. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The issue of gender in the construction industry has received considerable attention. However, most of the research has been from a male perspective and has considered how male perceptions of females act as an impediment to women's career progression. An understanding of women's self-perception is important because it helps to explain how women make sense of the barriers and challenges they face in a male dominated culture and how they seek to attain positive outcomes for themselves. A comparison of women in the construction industry with women in other male-dominated (legal) and female-dominated (nursing) industries reveals little variation in self perceptions. Indeed, women in the construction industry emerge relatively positively, with the highest overall level of self-esteem. This is encouraging and surprising, given the considerable evidence of significant barriers to entry and career progression for women in the construction industry, compared to other industries. It indicates that the construction industry is nota special case and that support strategies used in other industries are directly transferable, although the culture of the construction industry may make them more difficult to implement.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; equality; gender; lawyers; nursing; perception; professionals; self |
| Index terms: | variation, career, evidence, strategy, face, lawyer, women, construction industry |
| Subjects: | psychology, evaluation and assessment methods, profession, sociology, industry analysis, management, professional development, contractual condition |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Contract Administration, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here