Cost vs. Production: Labour deployment and productivity in social housing construction in England, Scotland, Denmark and Germany

Clarke, L and Herrmann, G (2004) Cost vs. Production: Labour deployment and productivity in social housing construction in England, Scotland, Denmark and Germany. Construction Management and Economics, 22(10), pp. 1057-1066. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Labour deployment on representative large-scale housing projects is analysed to reveal distinct differences between England, Germany, Scotland and Denmark. In the light of the debates on convergence/divergence of HRM systems and qualitatively different production systems, the paper is apposite in demonstrating structural differences in the organization of the construction process, their implications for efficiency and productivity, and their impact on employment and contract relations, innovation and skills. The effects of the overriding cost rationale of the British system are illustrated in terms of labour deployment and the efficiency and productivity of the site construction process. Labour deployment is based on the rationale of extensive subcontracting, with main contractors providing the management and cost function whilst their productive capacity rests on subcontracting supply chains. The main contractor has come to specialize in two areas, costing and the management of the process. Subcontractors provide all production personnel and thus the production knowledge for carrying out the work packages and stages. On the continent, in contrast, the economic rationale is different, as main contractors do not depend nearly as much on the production capacity of subcontracting.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: european construction; labour deployment; productivity; social housing
Index terms: construction process, costing, subcontractor, efficiency, Denmark, package, productivity, employment, social housing, England, production system, main contractor, housing project, personnel, Scotland, subcontracting, Germany
Subjects: manufacturing engineering, management, contractual arrangements, organization, accounting and finance, practitioner, Geography, building construction, housing and residential development, performance management
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Site Management, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Human Resources, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here