Jalilzadehazhari, E; Johansson, P; Johansson, J and Mahapatra, K (2019) Developing a decision-making framework for resolving conflicts when selecting windows and blinds. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 15(5), pp. 357-381. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Windows and blinds play a significant role in both shaping energy consumption and enhancing indoor comfort. But there are still difficulties with selecting windows and blinds due to the existence of potential conflicts between visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and life-cycle cost. A literature review was conducted with the purpose of developing a decision-making framework that resolves the conflicts, and allows selecting a window and blind design based on trade-off between visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and life-cycle cost. The decision-making framework was developed by integrating non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II as an optimization algorithm with analytical hierarchy process as a multi-criteria decision-making method. The optimization algorithm considers different window and blind design variables and analyses multiple designs, while the multi-criteria decision-making method ranks the optimization results and selects a trade-off design. An operating package enabled the decision-making framework to be automated. The operating package was obtained by coupling EnergyPlus as a simulation tool and modeFRONTIER as an integration platform. The decision-making framework was developed to select a trade-off window and blind design through intelligent use of simulation in analysing big-data in built environment, energy and cost sectors. Application of the framework ensures the minimum visual and thermal comfort thresholds with the lowest energy demand and cost. Architects and designers can use the framework during the design or renovation phase of residential and commercial buildings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytical hierarchy process; big-data; framework design; multi-criteria decision-making; non-dominated genetic algorithm ii; optimization; trade-off design |
| Index terms: | literature review, multi-criteria decision-making, decision-making, integration, energy consumption, window, designer, comfort, architect, thermal comfort, simulation tool, coupling, energyplus, genetic algorithm, platform, visual comfort, optimization algorithm, renovation, analytical hierarchy process, energy demand, package, built environment, commercial building |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, systems engineering, renovation and retrofit, digital design, contractual arrangements, energy systems, architectural elements, environmental science, decision-making and optimization, organizational analysis, construction type, occupational health and safety management, algorithms, infrastructure and transport systems, decision analysis, environmental engineering, data analysis and analytics, profession |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Procurement, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here