Lam, P T I; Kumaraswamy, M M and Ng, S T (2004) The use of construction specifications in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 22(10), pp. 1067-1079. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Singapore announced its Construction 21 Blueprint in 1999, which included quality improvement as one of the many initiatives aimed at making the construction industry more competitive and efficient. This has culminated in the development of the National Productivity and Quality Specification (NPQS), which was meant to provide a benchmark of desirable quality standards for construction works in Singapore. A survey was carried out in late 2002 before the launch of the NPQS to investigate the use of specifications in the then Singapore construction industry. A representative cross section of samples was taken to include clients, consultants and contractors in both the public and private sectors. Whilst interestingly different perceptions of the respondents were captured, the survey results show that there is indeed scope for improvement from both the drafting and usage viewpoints. On the drafting side, lack of co-ordination, ambiguities, irrelevant clauses and inappropriate standards were the frequently cited problems. On the usage side, specifications were not used as rigorous as they should be for controlling quality of works on site. Clients, in particular, were concerned with the late approvals of alternative material proposals. These findings point to the need for extra care and attention on the preparation and use of specifications as important project control documents, which always form part of the contracts executed in Singapore.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracts; design documentation; Singapore; specifications |
| Index terms: | documents, specification, proposal, documentation, survey, construction work, drafting, project control, construction industry, quality standard, Singapore, alternative material, late approval, quality improvement, private sector, productivity |
| Subjects: | project planning, project delivery, technical documentation, operations management, materials science, scope management, control systems, data collection methods, industry analysis, quality assurance, Geography, contractual condition, professional development, management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Design Practice, Contract Administration, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here