Loosemore, M and Lam, A S Y (2004) The locus of control: A determinant of opportunistic behaviour in construction health and safety. Construction Management and Economics, 22(4), pp. 385-394. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Current research and practice in the field of risk management focus almost exclusively on the downside of risk, meaning that many opportunities for improved performance go unmissed. There is substantial evidence that opportunities demand a different management approach to problems and, that there is need to better understand this process. However, our understanding of opportunism has been hindered by the absence of research into the main forces that impede and drive opportunistic behaviour. This paper explores these forces and investigates one in particular - the locus of control (self perceived influence over decision-making). This investigation is conducted in a health and safety context because this is an area of particularly poor performance in the construction industry, where the locus of control is especially relevant. The paper concludes that the overall locus of control is high in relation to health and safety issues. However, there is considerable discrepancy in perceived levels of influence between different occupational, gender and ethnic groups, which need to be addressed if the industry is to improve its performance in this area.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | behaviour; culture; discrimination; empowerment; gender; health and safety; locus of control; opportunity management; risk management |
| Index terms: | decision-making, evidence, health and safety issues, discrimination, empowerment, opportunism, health and safety, meaning, opportunity management, investigation, risk management, opportunistic behaviour, construction industry, determinant, ethnic group |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, demography, decision analysis, sociology, industry analysis, professional ethics, management, health safety and environment, financial risk, risk assessment, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, business |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Legal Issues, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here