Ng, F P and Björnsson, H C (2004) Using real option and decision analysis to evaluate investments in the architecture, construction and engineering industry. Construction Management and Economics, 22(5), pp. 471-482. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Many architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) professionals would like to use real option (RO) and decision analysis (DA) to evaluate alternatives in investment in the face of uncertainty. However, they have difficulty deciding which one to use and many are not aware of the subtle differences in assumptions and techniques between the two methodologies. We explain how DA and RO can be applied in complete and incomplete markets and what implicit assumptions we need to be aware of in each scenario. Through a toll road example, it is shown that, in a complete market, DA and RO give the same valuation regardless of the choice of the utility function. A formula is provided for pricing any investment in a complete market. The paper also discusses why the values calculated using DA and RO differ in an incomplete market and when DA is more appropriate than RO and vice versa.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision analysis; investment evaluation; market; real option; sequential decision-making |
| Index terms: | markets, real option, decision analysis, pricing, decision-making, methodology, toll, face |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, psychology, transportation engineering, decision analysis, research methods |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here