Ng, F P; Björnsson, H C and Chiu, S S (2004) Valuing a price cap contract for material procurement as a real option. Construction Management and Economics, 22(2), pp. 141-150. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
This paper uses real option methodology to compare the cost of a long-term contract with a price cap to that of spot purchases in construction material procurement. In construction, material procurements are usually short-term, project-based and subject to high price volatility. These characteristics and the competitive nature of the industry lower the profit margin of contractors. We have observed that contractors purchase a stable amount of commodity materials such as concrete, structural steel and lumber year after year. For contractors, the price cap reduces the price volatility of materials without their being obliged to purchase a certain quantity; for suppliers, the price-cap contracts give them steady demand and a bigger market share. We evaluate this price-cap contract as a real option and find the contractor's optimal ordering policy. When materials are not frequently traded, we model price processes by using related market information and then evaluate the idiosyncratic uncertainties in a risk-neutral setting. Our methodology does not require market completeness and incorporates some of the results of the latest research in finance such as correlation pricing, option pricing and zero level pricing, as well as Monte Carlo simulation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | material procurement; ordering policy; pricing; real option; supply chain |
| Index terms: | Monte Carlo simulation, pricing, market share, option, real option, construction material, profit, material procurement, methodology |
| Subjects: | research methods, market analysis, decision analysis, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, modelling and simulation, building materials |
| Topics: | Site Management, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here