Shen, Q; Li, H; Chung, J and Hui, P Y (2004) A framework for identification and representation of client requirements in the briefing process. Construction Management and Economics, 22(2), pp. 213-221. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The briefing process is critical to the successful delivery of construction projects. Although a number of briefing guides have been developed, attempting to address the problems of briefing, they are often criticized as being too general and implicit. This paper describes a structured framework for identifying and representing client requirements (CRs) in the briefing process. It integrates the value management (VM) methodology with function analysis system technique (FAST) and functional performance specification (FPS) to enable the client organization and project team to systematically identify, clarify and clearly represent CRs in the briefing process. It comprises four interrelated phases: preparation, information, analysis and evaluation. This paper starts with a critical review of previous work in briefing and function analysis, followed by an introduction to the research methodology and detailed illustration of the proposed framework. The use of this framework can facilitate and lead to systematic identification and clarification of client requirements and the formation of a more precise and explicit representation of these requirements. The limitations of the approach are also discussed in the paper.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | briefing; client requirements; function analysis; functional performance specification; value management |
| Index terms: | methodology, construction project, performance specification, briefing, client organization, value management, client requirements, research methodology, project team, function analysis |
| Subjects: | management, research methods, tendering, production management, professional development, client relations, research design and methodology, scope management, data science, project delivery |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Value Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here