Steele, A and Sodhi, D (2004) Black and minority ethnic contractors and consultants and UK housing associations' contracting power. Construction Management and Economics, 22(2), pp. 151-157. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Housing associations are the main providers of social housing within the UK and a major force in area regeneration initiatives. They also have a pivotal role to play in promoting equality of opportunity since a large proportion of their clients are from black and minority ethnic (BME) communities. However, few housing associations have recognized the potential of their purchasing power in terms of investment in construction and maintenance work in promoting equality or the business benefits of doing so. This paper presents the research findings of a study of housing associations' contracting practices in London. The study aimed to highlight and document current practices in the employment of BME contractors and consultants and identify the equal opportunity issues associated with their engagement. The findings suggest that there is a general lack of appreciation among housing associations of the importance of employing BME contractors and consultants from both an equal opportunity and a business perspective. In view of the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 and government guidance on equal opportunities, the housing association sector has still to fully recognize its influential role in this area.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; equality; ethnic and minorities; housing |
| Index terms: | housing association, housing, social housing, London, black and minority ethnic, minority, purchasing, employment, equal opportunity |
| Subjects: | housing and residential development, sociology, procurement strategy, management, Geography, institutional client, construction type |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Human Resources, Ethics, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Procurement, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here