Trigunarsyah, B (2004) A review of current practice in constructability improvement: Case studies on construction projects in Indonesia. Construction Management and Economics, 22(6), pp. 567-580. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The concept of constructability emerged in the late 1970s, evolved from studies into how improvement can be achieved to increase cost efficiency and quality in the construction industry. It is an approach that links the design and construction processes. The studies in the USA, UK and, later, in Australia have demonstrated that improved constructability has lead to significant savings in both cost and time required for completing construction projects. However, in implementing constructability improvement, it is important to consider the uniqueness of the construction industry in a specific country. To improve constructability in Indonesian construction projects, two main questions need to be answered: how is construction integrated into planning and design in existing practice and how can constructability be improved. Case studies indicate that the contractual relationships between the project team members determine the options for early involvement of construction personnel, and that the current constructability practices have had some positive impacts on project performance. In addition to a reduction in constructability problems, current constructability practices have enabled significant economic savings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | constructability improvement; construction industry; Indonesia; project performance |
| Index terms: | project performance, design and construction, project team, option, constructability, construction industry, case study, Indonesia, Australia, savings, construction project, contractual relationship, cost efficiency, construction personnel |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, industry analysis, economics, construction integration, Geography, production management, project management theory and practice, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, project delivery, workforce, data collection methods, contractual relationship |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Contract Administration, Design Practice, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here