Farsighted project contract management: Incomplete in its entirety

Turner, J R (2004) Farsighted project contract management: Incomplete in its entirety. Construction Management and Economics, 22(1), pp. 75-83. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The purpose of project organization is to create a cooperative environment. Contracts are the method by which the owner creates a project organization to employ resources to achieve their development objectives. Contracts should aim to produce a cooperative organization, aligning the contractors' objectives with the owners. A three-dimensional vector (reward, risk, safeguard), adapted from the Transaction Cost Economics literature, is used to analyse the efficacy of contract types to do this. Contracts are also unavoidably incomplete. They need to respond to unforeseen circumstance. A four-dimensional vector (incentive intensity, adaptiveness, reliance on monitoring and control, reliance on the courts), also from the Transaction Costs Economics literature, is used to analyse the governance efficacy of contract types. The results are used to develop a contract selection strategy, depending on whether the uncertainty is controlled by the client or the contractor, the project is simple or complex, and the uncertainty is in the project's product, method of delivery or both.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contract selection; forms of contract; governance; incentivization; project organization; transaction costs
Index terms: contract management, owner, monitoring, form of contract, project organization, strategy, governance, incentivization, transaction cost
Subjects: business, organizational theory, control systems, contract management, financial analysis, contractual arrangements, sociology, management, risk assessment
Topics: Cost Management, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Contract Administration, Risk Management, Governance, Procurement, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here