Al-Sobiei, O S; Arditi, D and Polat, G (2005) Predicting the risk of contractor default in Saudi Arabia utilizing artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA) techniques. Construction Management and Economics, 23(4), pp. 423-430. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The construction project is subject to several risks, one of the most important of which is contractor default because contractor default may increase the final project cost considerably. In the US construction industry, owners commonly shield themselves from the risk of contractor default by transferring this risk to the contractor, who in turn transfers this risk to a surety company. On the other hand, the General Directorate of Military Works (GDMW) of the IK ingdom of Saudi Arabia retains the risk of contractor default rather than transferring it to a third party. An artificial neural network (ANN) and a genetic algorithm (GA) are used in this study to predict the risk of contractor default in construction projects undertaken for the Saudi armed forces. Based on this prediction, the Saudi GDMW can make a decision to engage or not to engage the services of a contractor. In case the models are not able to generate reliable predictions (or generate contradictory outcomes), the GDMW will have to augment its budget with contingency funds to be used in the event of contractor default. The outcome of this study is of particular relevance to construction owners because it proposes an approach that can allow them to replace an indiscriminate blanket policy by a policy that is rational, effective, prudent and economical.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural networks; contractor default; genetic algorithms; prediction model |
| Index terms: | construction industry, owner, Saudi Arabia, construction project, prediction model, artificial neural network, project cost, surety, default, genetic algorithm |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, prediction and forecasting, dispute resolution, sociology, industry analysis, economics, algorithms, Geography, production management, warranties |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Contract Administration, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here