Caplan, A S and Gilham, J (2005) Included against the odds: Failure and success among minority ethnic built-environment professionals in Britain. Construction Management and Economics, 23(10), pp. 1007-1015. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Despite domination of the built environment professions (BEPs) by white men, there exists within it a small core of minority ethnic (ME) professionals who are becoming well organized and articulate within their professions. Based on a foundation of research conducted for the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) and more recent work for the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) by the Centre for Ethnic Minority Studies (CEMS, Royal Holloway, University of London), this paper describes and analyses the factors that have enabled this group to enter the industry and, in some cases, to prosper. Implicit in the analysis is a critique of those structural and cultural factors that have prevented others from following their career aims, and of the failure of the industry more generally to be inclusive and diversify its workforce. The discussion draws upon interviews with ME professionals, students, lecturers and employers working in Britain in construction, engineering, architecture, surveying, planning and urban and landscape design to exemplify the key areas of access, support, development and progression in the industry, and to present a clear and rounded picture of what it takes to succeed as a ME professional in the BEPs today.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; construction; diversity; management; minority ethnic |
| Index terms: | construction industry, profession, London, landscape design, minority, built environment, critique, becoming, ethnic minority, career, interview, surveying |
| Subjects: | professional development, Geography, design practice, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, philosophical process, sociology, demography, institututions, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Ethics, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here