The cult of customer responsiveness: Is design innovation the price of a client-focused construction industry?

Ivory, C (2005) The cult of customer responsiveness: Is design innovation the price of a client-focused construction industry? Construction Management and Economics, 23(8), pp. 861-870. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Much has been written about the positive contribution made by the customer to innovation in bespoke and low-volume products like those of construction. Far less attention has been given to the potentially corrosive effects the client might have on innovation. Drawing on three construction case studies, this paper argues that strong client leadership may have negative consequences for innovation, including the suppression of innovation and an overly narrow focus on particular types of innovation. Given that innovation has a key role in the future competitiveness of any industry, it is argued that the role of the client in construction innovation requires more careful examination than it has thus far been afforded.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: competitiveness; innovation; the client
Index terms: construction innovation, drawing, competitiveness, construction industry, case study
Subjects: industry analysis, building construction, market analysis, technical documentation, data collection methods
Topics: Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here