Newton, R and Ormerod, M (2005) Do disabled people have a place in the UK construction industry? Construction Management and Economics, 23(10), pp. 1071-1081. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
In the UK, a significant number of disabled people are unemployed and previous research has suggested reasons for this include the inaccessibility of workplace environments that have either not been designed, or adapted, to accommodate the requirements of disabled people, and the nature of work being undertaken in that workplace environment. Since there has been no previous research within the context of the construction industry, the aim was to explore contractors' practices in the employment of disabled people and in the adaptation of workplace environments. A survey was undertaken of the top 100 UK contractors in the UK. Views of disabled people were also sought, and access audits of workplace environments were undertaken. The combined analysis shows that compared to UK industries in general, contractors are less likely to have appropriate policies and practices in place to support disabled job applicants through the recruitment process. However, contractors as employers are more likely to make 'reasonable adjustments' as required by the UK Disability Discrimination Act if the adjustment is relatively inexpensive, and if minimal adjustments are required in order to adapt workplaces such that they provide an inclusive approach to the employment of disabled people. Additionally, contractors work hard to ensure that if an employee becomes disabled they are appropriately supported in continued employment. Only a small number of construction organizations believed that 'disabled people do not have a place in the UK construction industry' It can be concluded that while contractors are unlikely to recruit disabled people, they are more likely to continue to employ people once they become disabled, but there is very little monitoring and evaluation of this process by contractors and it is likely that contractors are not fulfilling their obligations under the Disability Discrimination Act as a result.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | disability discrimination act; disabled employees; reasonable adjustments; social inclusion; workplace environments |
| Index terms: | survey, disabled, discrimination, disability, workplace environment, access audit, employment, adaptation, construction organization, social inclusion, construction industry, recruitment, monitoring |
| Subjects: | control systems, user focus, organization, data collection methods, design practice, management, industry analysis, professional ethics, sociology, health conditions and diseases |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Site Management, Human Resources, Ethics, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here