Tam, C M; Tong, T K L; Lau, T C T and Chan, K K (2005) Selection of vertical formwork system by probabilistic neural networks models. Construction Management and Economics, 23(3), pp. 245-254. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
A good formwork system enables speedy completion of the concrete structure, following which other subsequent trades can be started. However, the current intuitive judgment approach in the selection of formwork systems cannot assure an optimal and consistent result. Artificial neural networks may improve the selection process. Formwork represents a significant part of the cost of concrete structure construction. Most subsequent trades including internal finishing and external cladding depend on the completion of the building structure. A suitable formwork system is thus crucial for maintaining the smooth flow of the various trades and a proper working sequence of various work activities. Based on data collected from a previous study, it is clear that the key factors affecting the selection of a relevant formwork system include building height and structural system, concrete finish, site conditions, availability of equipment and building shape. Neural network models are developed for the selection of vertical formwork systems using the architecture of the probabilistic neural network (PNN) model. A case study verifies the validity of this approach.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | formwork selection; pnn; probabilistic neural network |
| Index terms: | artificial neural network, neural network, cladding, concrete structure, building height, validity, formwork, judgment, case study |
| Subjects: | building performance, building construction, structural engineering, artificial intelligence, modelling and simulation, building materials, dispute resolution, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here