Tang, S L; Ying, K C; Anson, M and Lu, M (2005) Rmcsim: A simulation model of a ready-mixed concrete plant serving multiple sites using multiple truckmixers. Construction Management and Economics, 23(1), pp. 15-31. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
A simulation computer program named RMCSIM has been developed to simulate a whole day of activities for a concrete plant with N mixing bays, M truckmixers (with two different capacities: 5 m3 and 7 m3) serving S sites, where sites are at variable distances D from the plant and variable quantities Q are required by the sites in which different placing methods are used. It is developed based on a set of data which has been reported earlier in another paper (Anson et al., 2002). An optimal number of truckmixers for a particular day's order size can be found from the results of the simulations. The optimal volume of concrete that a truckmixer carries on any one day is found to be about 27 m3 in Hong Kong situations. It is also found that a two mixing bay concrete plant always provides better services than a one mixing bay plant. The mix combinations of 5 m3 and 7 m3 truckmixers in the fleet have no significant effect on concreting service performance. Lastly, it can be deduced that the causes of unsatisfactory concrete delivery performance are most likely due to site managers' difficulties in precise planning rather than the scheduling at the concrete plant.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concrete; construction; Hong Kong; Monte Carlo; optimal; plant; ready-mixed; simulation; sites; truckmixers |
| Index terms: | scheduling, computer program, site manager, placing, Hong Kong, concreting |
| Subjects: | software systems, operations research, building construction, concrete and cementitious materials, Geography, practitioner |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Geographical Context, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here