Wood, G D and Ellis, R C T (2005) Main contractor experiences of partnering relationships on UK construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 23(3), pp. 317-325. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Partnering provides a major opportunity for improving project performance, whilst offering direct benefits to the whole of the supply chain. Many research studies reinforce this assertion although there is less critical analysis examining the nature of partnering in practice and whether the claims made for it are consistently justified. The experiences of commercial surveyors and managers within the UK construction industry have been gathered in a pilot study, drawing on the opinions of 48 commercial managers employed by a leading national contractor. The perceptions and experiences of partnering relationships are generally positive, although the early optimism at the beginning of such arrangements is seldom sustained throughout the project lifecycle. Attitudes to partnering are similar whether the relationship is upstream (client/main contractor) or downstream (main contractor/subcontractor). The growth in popularity of alternative procurement methods and statutory adjudication are both regarded as having placed contracting parties on a more equal footing. However in today's competitive environment, contractors continue to operate on tight margins and, common to all project stakeholders, the financial imperative remains the commercial manager's principal consideration. Trust is hard-earned and relationships are still characterised by a cost driven agenda.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | commercial relationships; partnering; procurement; trust |
| Index terms: | statutory adjudication, procurement method, partnering, main contractor, contracting party, project lifecycle, project performance, construction industry, manager, national contractor, drawing, project stakeholder, construction project, subcontractor |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, production management, industry analysis, sociology, partnership management, practitioner, project completion, contractual arrangements, legal systems, technical documentation |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Legal Issues, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here