Construction scheduling using multi-constraint and genetic algorithms approach

Dawood, N and Sriprasert, E (2006) Construction scheduling using multi-constraint and genetic algorithms approach. Construction Management and Economics, 24(1), pp. 19-30. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Reliable construction schedules are important for effective co-ordination across the supply chain and various trades at the construction work face. Reliability of construction schedules can be enhanced and improved through satisfying all potential constraints prior to execution on site. Availability of resources, execution space, execution logic, physical dependency of construction products, client instructions and others can be regarded as potential constraints. Current scheduling tools and techniques are fragmented and designed to deal with a limited set of construction constraints. In this context, a methodology termed 'multi-constraint scheduling' is introduced in which four major groups of construction constraints including physical, contract, resource and information constraints are considered to demonstrate the approach. A genetic algorithm (GA) has been developed and used for a multi-constraint optimization problem. Given multiple constraints such as activity dependency, limited working area, and resource and information readiness, the GA alters tasks' priorities and construction methods so as to arrive at an optimum or near optimum set of project duration, cost, and smooth resource profiles. The multi-constraints approach has been practically developed as an embedded macro in MS Project. Several experiments were conducted using a simple project and it was concluded that GA can provide near optimum and constraint-free schedules within an acceptable searching time. This will be vital to improve the productivity and predictability of construction sites.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: genetic algorithms; lean construction; multi-constraint scheduling; multi-objective optimization; project management
Index terms: methodology, construction product, scheduling, genetic algorithm, lean construction, experiment, construction method, face, construction site, construction work, multi-objective optimization, project management, duration, construction scheduling, productivity
Subjects: psychology, operations management, work location, operations research, economic analysis, data collection methods, project controls, building construction, management, algorithms, research methods, project management theory and practice
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here