A performance-based bridge LCCA model using visual inspection inventory data

Huang, R Y (2006) A performance-based bridge LCCA model using visual inspection inventory data. Construction Management and Economics, 24(10), pp. 1069-1081. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Since most bridge life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) depends heavily on the analyst's experience to determine the times and costs of remedial actions over a bridge's lifetime, the results are often subject to question because of their subjectivity. While some work has been done over the years to develop reliable deterioration models for determining such times and costs, the proposed models often require sophisticated inspection data, which is costly to obtain, and/or complex mathematical calculations. A simple linear deterioration model based on visual inspection inventory data concerning bridge components is introduced and integrated into the LCC analysis. The proposed model provides an alternative approach to bridge LCC analysis that can improve the objectivity of analysis and does not require input of sophisticated inspection, and thus facilitates application of bridge life cycle cost analysis. The LCCA method developed in this study is applied to a case study of alternative PCI (Pre-stressed Concrete I-girder) and a PCB (Pre-stressed Concrete Box-girder) bridges for the purpose of model validation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bridge management systems; deterioration model; life cycle cost analysis
Index terms: validation, inventory, subjectivity, girder, management system, deterioration, visual inspection, life cycle cost analysis, inspection, performance-based, case study
Subjects: material degradation and durability, management, performance measurement, professional development, data collection methods, economics, human factors and perception, structural engineering, inventory management, quality assurance, professional practice
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Cost Management, Quality Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Information Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here