Johnson, C; Lizarralde, G and Davidson, C H (2006) A systems view of temporary housing projects in post-disaster reconstruction. Construction Management and Economics, 24(4), pp. 367-378. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Natural cataclysms (earthquakes, hurricanes and so forth) become natural disasters when they coincide with vulnerabilities; unfortunately, informal settlements in developing countries are only too often highly vulnerable - a reality amply and unhappily confirmed by available statistics. In this context, reconstruction projects are sandwiched between the short-term necessity to act promptly and the long-term requirements of sustainable community development - a situation that is currently reflected in alternative and conflicting paradigms at the policy level. Adopting a case-study approach, we explore the use of temporary housing within two post-disaster environments, where the impact of different organizational designs leads to fundamentally different solutions to the short-term housing problem. Our research adopts a dynamic systems approach, associating strategic organizational team design with the development of tactical technical proposals. Two case studies from Turkey and Colombia show that a coherent approach to the sequential stages of providing immediate shelter, temporary housing and permanent reconstruction is not always obtained. The research results emphasize that the performance of reconstruction projects is directly linked to the design and management of the project team.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | natural disasters; organizational design; post-disaster reconstruction; systems approach; temporary housing |
| Index terms: | Colombia, sustainable community, proposal, natural disaster, developing country, housing, temporary housing, vulnerability, organizational design, case study, Turkey, reconstruction, project team, statistics, post-disaster reconstruction, paradigm, informal settlement, earthquake |
| Subjects: | Geography, development economics, education and knowledge transfer, post-disaster and reconstruction, communities and social development, environmental hazards, housing and residential development, building construction, construction type, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, business, project planning, project delivery, specific urban areas and projects |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Urban Studies, International Construction, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here