Diffusion of ISO 9000 certification in the precast concrete industry

Kale, S and Arditi, D (2006) Diffusion of ISO 9000 certification in the precast concrete industry. Construction Management and Economics, 24(5), pp. 485-495. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

ISO 9000 is one of the most important administrative innovations of the last two decades. The Turkish precast concrete industry is an interesting example of the diffusion of this important administrative innovation. Innovation diffusion theory proposes that the diffusion of an innovation is driven by internal (i.e. behaviours of copying others) and external (i.e. complying with client requirements, changes in government regulations, demand conditions, and consulting firms' suggestions) influence factors. The propositions of innovation diffusion theory are empirically tested by using three mathematical models: the internal influence model, the external influence model and the mixed influence model. The mixed influence model has the highest explanatory power and the diffusion of ISO 9000 certification in the precast concrete industry is primarily driven by internal rather than external influence factors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: innovation diffusion; iso 9000 series; precast concrete industry; quality assurance; quality control
Index terms: client requirements, quality control, explanatory power, government regulation, precast concrete industry, mathematical model, certification, innovation diffusion, ISO, quality assurance
Subjects: standards development, project delivery, mathematical modelling, sociology, quality assurance, industry analysis, administrative processes, theoretical framing, professional development, health safety and environment
Topics: Quality Management, Contract Administration, Health and Safety, Information Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here