Lu, S L and Sexton, M (2006) Innovation in small construction knowledge-intensive professional service firms: A case study of an architectural practice. Construction Management and Economics, 24(12), pp. 1269-1282. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Small construction knowledge-intensive professional service firms (SCKIPSFs) are becoming increasingly important agents of innovation within the construction industry. The nature and process of innovation in SCKIPSFs, however, is generally considered through the constraining prism of research results generated from significantly different contexts, such as from manufacturing sectors or non-project based firms. A theory of innovation for SCKIPSFs is developed from a longitudinal 22-month case study of a small architectural practice. Two forms of knowledge-based innovation were discerned from the empirical work: exploitative innovation and explorative innovation. 'Explorative innovation' was found to be located in immediate 'new' project domains, and entailed search, variation, experimentation, activity to solve project-specific problems; while 'exploitative innovation' concentrated on developing generic organisational infrastructure to 'refine' and 'improve the efficiency' of the firm operations to nurture capability for future activity. The key challenge for SCKIPSFs is to develop and manage an appropriate balance between explorative and exploitative innovation over time in order to generate sustainable competitive advantage.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | innovation; knowledge-intensive; professional service firms; small enterprises |
| Index terms: | agent, variation, experiment, small enterprise, construction industry, architectural practice, professional service firm, becoming, project-based firm, case study, competitive advantage, efficiency |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, business, organization, philosophical process, industry analysis, market analysis, contractual condition, performance management |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here