Manoliadis, O; Tsolas, I and Nakou, A (2006) Sustainable construction and drivers of change in Greece: A Delphi study. Construction Management and Economics, 24(2), pp. 113-120. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
During the last decade, sustainable development issues have been gradually adopted in Greece's construction industry, changing the traditional methods and technology. The aim of this investigation is to identify potential drivers of change, to position them properly in the wider context of sustainable construction and to outline the progress to be expected in the coming decade. The methodological framework used is a Delphi technique based on a questionnaire of 20 experts (consultant engineers, construction managers and contractors). The results show that the most important influences on sustainable construction in Greece are energy conservation measures, resource conservation strategies and waste reduction. In terms of the initiatives expected in the coming decade, energy conservation measures, waste reduction measures, as well as product innovation and certification are expected to rank high. In conclusion, the results are consistent with those of previous researchers showing significant trends towards land use, energy, and resource conservation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | change; construction policy; Delphi method; Greece; sustainable construction |
| Index terms: | waste reduction, questionnaire, construction manager, Delphi technique, Greece, land use, strategy, sustainable development, certification, sustainable construction, resource conservation, energy conservation, construction industry, investigation, engineer, product innovation, Delphi method |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, profession, innovation studies, real estate economics, energy systems, sustainability assessment, management, sustainable construction, sustainable design, health safety and environment, Geography, administrative processes, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here