Time-cost model for building projects in Nigeria

Ogunsemi, D R and Jagboro, G O (2006) Time-cost model for building projects in Nigeria. Construction Management and Economics, 24(3), pp. 253-258. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The concept of project duration is important in assessing the success or viability of a construction project. A time-cost relationship for construction projects in Nigeria has been developed based on Bromilow's time-cost model. Cost data on 87 completed building projects executed within the period 1991-2000 were obtained. The data were subjected to regression analyses using double log and later the piecewise model with breakpoint. For the Nigerian situation, the Bromilow's time-cost model was found to be T=63C0.262 with poor predictive abilities (R=0.453, R2=0.205). An improved model using piecewise model with good predictive abilities (R=0.875, R2=0.765) was found to be T=118.563-0.401C (C ≤ 408) or 603.427 + 0.610C (C>408). The model is shown to be useful in predicting construction project durations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost; cost modelling; Nigeria; project management; time
Index terms: construction project, Nigeria, project management, regression analysis, modelling, duration, cost data, time-cost model
Subjects: project controls, statistical analysis, quantity surveying, accounting and finance, Geography, production management, project management theory and practice, analytical methods
Topics: Time Control, Risk Management, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here