Ok, S C and Sinha, S K (2006) Construction equipment productivity estimation using artificial neural network model. Construction Management and Economics, 24(10), pp. 1029-1044. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Estimating equipment production rates is both an art and a science. An accurate prediction of the productivity of earthmoving equipment is critical for accurate construction planning and project control. Owing to the unique work requirements and changeable environment of each construction project, the influences of job and management factors on operation productivity are often very complex. Hence, construction productivity estimation, even for an operation with well-known equipment and work methods, can be challenging. This study develops and compares two methods for estimating construction productivity of dozer operations (the transformed regression analysis, and a non-linear analysis using neural network model). It is the hypothesis of this study that the proposed neural networks model may improve productivity estimation models because of the neural network's inherent ability to capture non-linearity and the complexity of the changeable environment of each construction project. The comparison of results suggests that the non-linear artificial neural network (ANN) has the potential to improve the equipment productivity estimation model.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural network; construction equipment; productivity estimation |
| Index terms: | construction planning, project control, regression analysis, construction productivity, earthmoving, construction equipment, estimation, productivity, construction project, complexity, estimating, artificial neural network, science, neural network |
| Subjects: | construction planning, financial and cost management, construction operations, artificial intelligence, modelling and simulation, operations management, control systems, specialized education, systems engineering, statistical analysis, construction equipment, production management, management |
| Topics: | Plant and Equipment, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Site Management, Education, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here