Predicting construction firm performance: An empirical assessment of the differential impact between industry- and firm-specific factors

Phua, F T T (2006) Predicting construction firm performance: An empirical assessment of the differential impact between industry- and firm-specific factors. Construction Management and Economics, 24(3), pp. 309-320. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

It is obvious that the performance of firms hinges upon the dynamics of both industry- and firm-specific factors. A less obvious, and perhaps a more important, line of inquiry is that to the extent that they have a bearing on firm performance, how much do these two groups of factors respectively predict firm performance? To date, performance differences among construction firms that stem from industry- and firm-specific differential effect has remained largely unexplored. Using a dataset comprising 526 firms across various construction-related sectors, the sector-by-sector firm performance variation that is attributable to the heterogeneity of both industry- and firm-specific characteristics was empirically examined. That statistically significant results of different effect sizes are found indicates that although these factors are often assumed to be intertwined it is possible to study their respective impact on firm performance. Future studies could usefully replicate and extend this study to construction firms in other countries to further investigate what drives firm performance under different national, industry and firm contexts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: firm performance; firm-specific factors; industry-specific factors; institutional environment; performance heterogeneity; resource-based view
Index terms: dynamics, firm performance, resource-based view, future study, variation, dataset, construction firm
Subjects: business analysis, management, organization, data management, systems engineering, research design and methodology, contractual condition
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here