Polat, G; Arditi, D; Ballard, G and Mungen, U (2006) Economics of on-site vs off-site fabrication of rebar. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), pp. 1185-1198. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Many contractors prefer on-site fabrication of rebar while others find that off-site fabrication is more advantageous. The economics of on-site and off-site fabrication of rebar need to be compared on the basis of several factors that include the project environment, wages, labour considerations, the initial investment for equipment, waste of rebar, the cost of inventory, cycle time, and supply chain management. This study presents an economic comparison of the on-site and off-site fabrication practices of rebar by means of a simulation model that makes use of the factors mentioned earlier. The model is populated with actual data obtained from a trade centre project in Istanbul, Turkey. The article indicates that the off-site fabrication practice would have been more costly than the on-site practice in the project in Istanbul, a finding that was to be expected in circumstances that prevail in most developing countries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cut and bent rebar; lean construction; off-site fabrication; on-site fabrication; simulation model |
| Index terms: | rebar, Istanbul, wages, inventory, Turkey, developing country, lean construction, fabrication |
| Subjects: | building construction, inventory management, manufacturing engineering, business economics, building materials, development economics, Geography |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, International Construction, Human Resources, Supply Chain Management, Site Management, Construction Materials, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here