Balancing employee needs, project requirements and organisational priorities in team deployment

Raidén, A B; Dainty, A R J and Neale, R H (2006) Balancing employee needs, project requirements and organisational priorities in team deployment. Construction Management and Economics, 24(8), pp. 883-895. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

The 'people and performance' model asserts that performance is a sum of employee ability, motivation and opportunity (AMO). Despite extensive evidence of this people-performance link within manufacturing and many service sectors, studies within the construction industry are limited. Thus, a recent research project set out to explore the team deployment strategies of a large construction company with the view of establishing how a balance could be achieved between organisational strategic priorities, operational project requirements and individual employee needs and preferences. The findings suggested that project priorities often took precedence over the delivery of the strategic intentions of the organisation in meeting employees' individual needs. This approach is not sustainable in the long term because of the negative implications that such a policy had in relation to employee stress and staff turnover. It is suggested that a resourcing structure that takes into account the multiple facets of AMO may provide a more effective approach for balancing organisational strategic priorities, operational project requirements and individual employee needs and preferences more appropriately in the future.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; human resource management; motivation; organisational culture; teams
Index terms: turnover, strategy, human resource management, motivation, construction company, evidence, preference, organizational culture, case study, construction industry
Subjects: organization, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, business management, psychology, decision-making and reasoning, management, industry analysis, sociology
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Human Resources, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here