Shipworth, D (2006) Qualitative modelling of sustainable energy scenarios: An extension of the bon qualitative input-output model. Construction Management and Economics, 24(7), pp. 695-703. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Climate change is one of the major challenges facing economic systems at the start of the 21st century. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions will require both restructuring the energy supply system (production) and addressing the efficiency and sufficiency of the social uses of energy (consumption). The energy production system is a complicated supply network of interlinked sectors with 'knock-on' effects throughout the economy. End use energy consumption is governed by complex sets of interdependent cultural, social, psychological and economic variables driven by shifts in consumer preference and technological development trajectories. To date, few models have been developed for exploring alternative joint energy production-consumption systems. The aim of this work is to propose one such model. This is achieved in a methodologically coherent manner through integration of qualitative input-output models of production, with Bayesian belief network models of consumption, at point of final demand. The resulting integrated framework can be applied either (relatively) quickly and qualitatively to explore alternative energy scenarios, or as a fully developed quantitative model to derive or assess specific energy policy options. The qualitative applications are explored here.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bayesian belief networks; carbon management; energy policy; input-output analysis; sustainable consumption and production |
| Index terms: | energy consumption, option, modelling, input-output analysis, sustainable energy, efficiency, integration, greenhouse gas emission, climate change, preference, consumption, production system, bayesian belief network, energy policy, alternative energy |
| Subjects: | probabilistic model, decision analysis, organizational analysis, environmental health, decision-making and reasoning, performance management, manufacturing engineering, public policy, analytical methods, renewable energy, data analysis and analytics, energy systems, climate science, consumer economics |
| Topics: | Governance, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here