Steadman, P (2006) Allometry and built form: Revisiting Ranko Bon's work with the harvard philomorphs. Construction Management and Economics, 24(7), pp. 755-765. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Ranko Bon's Master's thesis at Harvard was devoted to the phenomenon of allometry in the forms of buildings. The concept of allometry comes from biology, and refers to changes in the forms of organisms as they alter in size. For example the ratio of volume to surface exposed to the air (including the lungs) is of great functional importance to animals, and tends to remain constant as they get larger. Bon studied allometry in residential buildings, and showed that both the ratio of surface to volume and the ratio of circulation length to floor area were preserved over a wide range of building sizes. Bon's work is revisited from a theoretical point of view, using a new method for representing large numbers of theoretical but realistic built forms, all derived from a single 'archetypal building'. By choosing default dimensions typical of dwellings, Bon's original results can be reproduced. By varying these dimensions of plan depth, numbers of storeys and widths of courts or light-wells, it is possible to show what precise kinds of allometric relationships are likely to be found in other types of day-lit buildings besides dwellings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | allometry; archetypal building; built form; circulation length; floor area; surface area; volume |
| Index terms: | dimension, default, circulation, residential building, built form |
| Subjects: | health monitoring assessment and metrics, urban design, urban form and morphology, construction type, dispute resolution |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here