Six-sigma as a strategy for process improvement on construction projects: A case study

Stewart, R A and Spencer, C A (2006) Six-sigma as a strategy for process improvement on construction projects: A case study. Construction Management and Economics, 24(4), pp. 339-348. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Significant expenditures of time, money and resources, both human and material, are wasted each year as a result of inefficient or non-existent quality management procedures. In an attempt to improve their market competitiveness, by limiting the extent of non-value-adding activities, some organizations are beginning to monitor the performance of internal and external engineering and construction processes. To achieve these bold aims, these organizations are looking to other industries such as manufacturing to examine the effectiveness of measuring and monitoring tools such as six-sigma. Only in recent years has the six-sigma method been utilized by some of the major players in the construction sector. To familiarize both researchers and practitioners on how to implement the six-sigma method and its potential benefits, the paper describes the outcomes of a six-sigma process improvement project (PIP) conducted for the construction of concrete longitudinal beams on the St Pancras raised railway station in London, UK. The outcome of the six-sigma PIP was the improved productivity of beam construction, enhanced interaction between project teams and reduced project delays. Moreover, interviews with key project participants were conducted to determine the success factors, barriers, suitability and advantages of the six-sigma approach compared with other TQM techniqes. In summary, the six-sigma approach provided the PIP team with a structured process improvement strategy to reduce waste and other non-value adding activities from the construction process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: process improvement; six-sigma; total quality management
Index terms: beam, monitoring, London, competitiveness, effectiveness, quality management, interaction, project team, case study, productivity, construction process, construction project, non-value-adding activity, practitioner, suitability, construction sector, project delay, process improvement, total quality management, railway station, interview, strategy, success factor
Subjects: data collection methods, control systems, practitioner, health monitoring assessment and metrics, evaluation methods, project delivery, structural engineering, management, performance management, Geography, production management, project controls, market analysis, building construction, design criteria, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, quality assurance, behavioral psychology
Topics: Time Control, Site Management, Quality Management, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here