Tam, C M; Tong, T K L and Chan, K K (2006) Rough set theory for distilling construction safety measures. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), pp. 1199-1206. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
There are numerous construction safety measures adopted by the local construction industry in Hong Kong. The purpose of this study is to distil the more significant measures from all these practices. To achieve this, the rough set theory, a data mining technique by applying the rule induction method, is proposed to distil the rules that determine the safety performance of construction firms. Rough sets represent a different mathematical approach to vagueness and uncertainty. It is based on the assumption that lowering the degree of precision in the data makes the data pattern more visible. Under such an assumption, the rough set theory can provide the ability of classifying vague and uncertain data. A practical example is used to illustrate its application to distil these safety measures and highlight those which are most effective and important in combating site accidents. There are three decision rules identified; the best one is companies with a comprehensive safety orientation programme and good safety award campaigns for senior management staff which give the lowest accident rate and the best safety performance. Safety management rules can be successfully reduced, facilitating contractors to direct their limited recourses effectively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | health and safety; rough set theory; site operations |
| Index terms: | data mining, Hong Kong, safety measures, construction industry, safety orientation, rough set, management staff, site operation, programme, construction firm, health and safety, safety management, construction safety, safety performance |
| Subjects: | operations management, data science, organization, occupational health and safety management, project controls, industry analysis, environmental health, management, Geography, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Site Management, Time Control, Human Resources, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here