Tam, V W Y; Tam, C M; Yiu, K T W and Cheung, S O (2006) Critical factors for environmental performance assessment (EPA) in the Hong Kong construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), pp. 1113-1123. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
With the rise in the public concern on environmental protection, more construction firms start to apply environmental management for their construction activities. As a result, environmental management systems (EMS) have been implemented in construction. However, to improve the construction environment in Hong Kong, environmental performance assessment (EPA) has been designed for reviewing, monitoring, checking and evaluating environmental performance. A list of evaluation factors for EPA are identified and grouped into seven major factors: management and training; air and noise; auditing; waste and water; cost saving on resources; energy; and regulation. The results from a survey highlight that the most important evaluation factor is management and training and the least significant result is regulation. A voluntary approach has been promoted instead of the traditional mandatory system. Furthermore, three case studies are used to test the reliability with seven groups of evaluation factors in measuring the environmental performance for construction. The results from the case study analysis proved the effectiveness of the developed environmental performance assessment. Therefore, the developed environmental performance assessment can benefit the construction industry and help to achieve continuous improvement on environmental performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | environmental performance assessment; factor analysis; Hong Kong |
| Index terms: | environmental management, construction industry, cost saving, effectiveness, factor analysis, monitoring, critical factor, construction activity, continuous improvement, case study, Hong Kong, environmental performance, regulation, environmental performance assessment, construction firm, survey, environmental protection, environmental management system |
| Subjects: | construction operations, environmental impact, control systems, data collection methods, risk assessment, organization, industry analysis, statistical analysis, environmental engineering, political science, Geography, sustainability assessment, performance measurement, economics, performance management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Quality Management, Governance, Sustainability, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here