Tang, C M; Wong, C W Y; Leung, A Y T and Lam, K C (2006) Selection of funding schemes by a borrowing decision model: A Hong Kong case study. Construction Management and Economics, 24(4), pp. 349-365. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
In financial decision-making, a number of mathematical models have been developed for financial management in construction. However, optimizing both qualitative and quantitative factors and the semi-structured nature of construction finance optimization problems are key challenges in solving construction finance decisions. The selection of funding schemes by a modified construction loan acquisition model is solved by an adaptive genetic algorithm (AGA) approach. The basic objectives of the model are to optimize the loan and to minimize the interest payments for all projects. Multiple projects being undertaken by a medium-size construction firm in Hong Kong were used as a real case study to demonstrate the application of the model to the borrowing decision problems. A compromise monthly borrowing schedule was finally achieved. The results indicate that Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Loan Guarantee Scheme (SGS) was first identified as the source of external financing. Selection of sources of funding can then be made to avoid the possibility of financial problems in the firm by classifying qualitative factors into external, interactive and internal types and taking additional qualitative factors including sovereignty, credit ability and networking into consideration. Thus a more accurate, objective and reliable borrowing decision can be provided for the decision-maker to analyse the financial options.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction firm; genetic algorithm; loan and finance; optimization |
| Index terms: | acquisition, case study, Hong Kong, financial management, option, qualitative factor, construction finance, funding, construction firm, networking, genetic algorithm, mathematical model, guarantee, financing, decision-making |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, financial management, contract structure, algorithms, Geography, communication, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, business, organization |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Risk Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here