Wong, J T Y and Hui, E C M (2006) Construction project risks: Further considerations for constructors' pricing in Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 24(4), pp. 425-438. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Construction project risks affect contractors' tender price. A host of factors influencing tender prices were identified and the importance of these factors evaluated by making use of the data collected in a postal questionnaire survey conducted to the 'Buildings' contractors in Hong Kong. Out of 60 factors identified, the availability of required cash, uncertainty in costs estimates, urgent need for work, past experience in similar projects and contract size are considered most important. The need for work and the amount of experience are similar to those factors affecting bidding decisions of top UK contractors. The findings suggest that in the upward adjustment of tender prices, the large-size contractors are more concerned with the uncertainty in costs estimates while the medium- and small-size contractors care more about no past experience. In the downward adjustment of prices, the large size of the contract is the main factor affecting the pricing of the large- and medium-size contractors while the urgent need for work is the main drive for the small-size ones. There are significant differences between the contractors' perceptions of the importance of the risk factors. This is consistent with differing attitudes towards bid mark-up decisions of the large- and medium-size contractors in Singapore.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidding; construction project risks; Hong Kong; importance indices; mark-up |
| Index terms: | Singapore, Hong Kong, pricing, risk factor, estimate, mark-up, tender price, survey, construction project, questionnaire, bidding |
| Subjects: | tendering, Geography, production management, price determination, environmental hazards, data collection methods, bidding, economic analysis, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Procurement, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here