Yang, I T (2006) Using Gaussian copula to simulate repetitive projects. Construction Management and Economics, 24(9), pp. 901-909. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
An important requirement for simulating repetitive projects is to treat correlations inherent in the repetition of same crews working at various locations. To attain the requirement, this study develops a new Monte Carlo simulation model implementing a Gaussian copula in conjunction with the inverse-transform method to generate correlated duration samples in repetitive projects that have pre-specified marginal distributions and pairwise rank correlations. The proposed model is equipped with an automatic approximation procedure to adjust an infeasible correlation matrix, if necessary. The proposed model is statistically verified through a real-life residential apartment project. The simulation results are compared to two conventional analyses (PERT and simulation without correlation) to show the aggregated impact of correlations. The proposed model contributes to the state-of-the-art in handling non-linear dependencies among activity durations that may have non-normal distributions. Moreover, it is flexible in the ways of correlation assessments (qualitative or quantitative), the magnitudes of correlations (weak to strong), and the types of marginal distributions (symmetrical or skewed).
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | copula; repetitive project; risk management; simulation; stochastic estimation |
| Index terms: | repetitive project, Monte Carlo simulation, estimation, risk management, duration, state of the art |
| Subjects: | production management, project controls, research dissemination and communication, risk assessment, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Time Control, Risk Management, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here