Hassanain, M A; Sanni-Anibire, M O; Mahmoud, A S and Hamida, M B (2020) Design guidelines for the functional efficiency of laboratory facilities. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 16(2), pp. 115-130. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
This paper presents the development of design guidelines to improve the functional efficiency of academic and research laboratory facilities. The study was carried out in four stages, firstly, key performance indicators for the functional performance of laboratory facilities were identified. Furthermore, the space syntax theory was used to identify the functional performance issues of selected case studies, and a post occupancy evaluation (POE) was also carried out to obtain users' feedback on these case studies. Finally, design guidelines containing functional elements were assessed through a five-point Likert scale questionnaire survey, and analysed using the Relative Importance Index (RII). Sample drawings based on the guidelines were developed and reviewed by 10 professional architects. The study resulted in 31 design guidelines, grouped into 5 categories, including 'space', 'access/circulation', 'building features', 'design for disabled users', and 'design for flexibility'. The RII values showed that the top three most important design guidelines included 'ease of identifying emergency or escape route' (97.78%), 'additional space for knee and chair space under the benches' (93.33%), 'adequate teaching equipment, such as a bookstand and marker board’s storage space for student microscopes, book bags and coats' (93.33%), and 'designated office space' (89.09%). Though design guidelines exist for laboratory facilities. The current study approaches the subject matter through a triangulation of methodologies. It also re-emphasizes the need for research and development to support the evolving requirements of modern laboratory facilities. It has the specific contribution of complementing existing standards and guidelines in the design of laboratory facilities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | academic; design; guidelines; laboratories; research |
| Index terms: | marker, architect, Likert scale, questionnaire, methodology, research and development, triangulation, escape, case study, key performance indicator, circulation, laboratory, efficiency, office space, disabled, space syntax, survey, drawing, relative importance index, post-occupancy evaluation |
| Subjects: | project delivery, evaluation methods, technical documentation, data collection methods, risk assessment, construction type, profession, research design and methodology, research management, sociology, emergency and crisis management, probability and distributions, urban design, research methods, performance management |
| Topics: | Ethics, Quality Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here