A metamodel for long-term thermal comfort in non-air-conditioned buildings

Jaffal, I; Inard, C; Ghaddar, N and Ghali, K (2020) A metamodel for long-term thermal comfort in non-air-conditioned buildings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 16(6), pp. 441-472. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Thermal comfort is a primary concern of building design. Accurate and rapid methods are needed to assess thermal comfort in non-air-conditioned buildings. In this work, a new flexible metamodel was developed for assessing long-term thermal comfort in non-air-conditioned buildings. Using five different indices, the metamodel was used to study the thermal comfort in an office during summer for two typical cold and hot European climates. The metamodel was fitted by multiple regression analysis with a low number of dynamic simulations using the design of experiments. A good fit was obtained for indices, such as maximum indoor temperature, that are consistently sensitive to the influencing factors. For the remaining indices, such as overheating degree-hours, the accuracy was dependent on the location and thermal mass of the building. An interpolation method was proposed that can be used when the metamodel fit is not good. This method gave accurate results with all the indices (R 2 > 0.98) when the values were obtained from the mean indoor temperature without additional computational efforts. The proposed metamodel could be used to rapidly assess long-term thermal comfort and to understand the relationships between building design and indoor thermal conditions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: free-running buildings; metamodel; non-air-conditioned buildings; overheating; thermal comfort
Index terms: summer, thermal comfort, multiple regression analysis, indoor temperature, building design, influencing factor, accuracy, design of experiment, overheating
Subjects: professional development, statistical analysis, thermal systems, environmental engineering, risk assessment, climate science, modelling and simulation, environmental science, architectural design
Topics: Research Practice, Information Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here