Goulding, J; Sexton, M; Zhang, X; Kagioglou, M; Aouad, G F and Barrett, P (2007) Technology adoption: Breaking down barriers using a virtual reality design support tool for hybrid concrete. Construction Management and Economics, 25(12), pp. 1239-1250. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
The use of hybrid concrete technologies as a viable solution to traditional frame design has been inhibited by a general lack of information. The uptake of this technology has therefore been slow and parochial, as designers have tended to stay loyal to 'traditional', tried and tested technologies - their 'comfort zone'. This research identifies the barriers associated with technology adoption at industry, organization and individual levels; and uses hybrid concrete as the core context for discussion. The role of an enabling design support tool (HyCon) is presented, which can allow designers to overcome these inhibitors by providing an immersive, interactive and information-rich environment through which design solutions can be explored. This collaborative research project describes a 'proof of concept' design support tool to promote the use of hybrid concrete in structural frames. It encompasses knowledge creation, application and sharing functionality, to envision support and use of this new technology - thereby promoting organizational learning. Research findings note that, while design tools have a valuable role to play, it is also important to appreciate that the uptake of any new technology is a social phenomenon, and that subsequent adoption/uptake requires careful embedding and augmentation into company organizational systems in order to leverage advantage.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision making; design method; organizational learning; simulation; virtual prototyping |
| Index terms: | concrete technology, knowledge creation, virtual prototyping, comfort, structural frame, technology adoption, design method, functionality, designer, design support tool, new technology, virtual reality, organizational learning, decision-making |
| Subjects: | professional development, architectural elements, virtual reality, design methods, occupational health and safety management, profession, design features, decision analysis, building materials, innovation and technology management, design practice, knowledge management |
| Topics: | Information Management, Health and Safety, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here